Re: Spam

We've all tried to prove our points, myself included in a way I  
shouldn't have.  Lets let this rest, at least until the spammers find  
some new, more creative methods of getting through the list  
protections. :)

On Jun 30, 2006, at 16:17 , Chris DeVoney wrote:

> At 01:18 PM 6/30/2006, Quantum Scientific wrote:
>> Well, isn't it clear that Matt's machine is 0wn3d?
>>
>> Why he doesn't know that, isn't clear, but ban him until he wipes  
>> and reinstalls.
>>
>> That would stop this conversation for now.
>
> It is as obviously that Matt's machine is owned as it is obvious  
> that your request to be banned until you figure out this e-mail  
> stuff should be honored. After all, your computing skills obviously  
> exceed Matt's. Just look at the contact us information on your  
> website:
>
> http://www.quantum-sci.com/about-us/contact.php
>
> On second thought, maybe the two are not the same.
>
> May I suggest eliciting more information about the state of e-mail,  
> the Internet, and web sites before making a blanket statement about  
> a newbie mistake by someone with more than a decade of experience  
> (and I'm sure I'm shorting Matt's career by saying 10+ years)?
>
> And, no, Matt nor Ken subscribe to the G.W. Bush school of  
> expression suppression. They would not ban you. Hopefully, you will  
> learn by reading this list.
>
> That is, if _your_ request to unsubscribe isn't taken seriously.
>
> cdv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev