RE: satellite data
"Casey Halverson" <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:57:09 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It is highly suggested that you take a look at actual VSAT providers, and stay away from immerisat, etc. if you can. for example: http://www.skycasters.com/broadband-satellite-compare/compare.html =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected]=20 > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of=20 > Franklin S Werren > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 8:59 AM > To: 'SeattleWireless Development List' > Subject: RE: satellite data >=20 > What about one of the Satellite carriers ??? > Starband, etc ...... > Equipment is small enough.... > It is a little touchy on the alignment tho... > =20 >=20 > Franklin S. Werren [email protected] www.bagpipes.net=20 > www.chautauqualake.net www.franksradio.net >=20 > www.chautauqua.us > =20 > All messages sent from this computer are scanned by more than=20 > one Virus Scanner and are Certified to be Virus Free. > =20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ralph Sims > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 10:29 PM > To: 'SeattleWireless Development List' > Subject: RE: satellite data >=20 > I know the bandwidth might not be there but if you can get=20 > one of the cellular provider's EVDO, EDGE, etc. connections=20 > there, that might work. It probably won't be anywhere near=20 > 500Kbps however but better than nothing. > You could try some sort of aggregation if you can get=20 > service. Typically you'll see ~100Kbps up and ~500Kbps down,=20 > unless you're in a prime location and they have their newer=20 > megabit service in place. >=20 > Another possibility is a couple (or more) WiFi relays to the=20 > nearest town with bandwidth. Yet another option might be a=20 > TV station to do a remote link maybe in conjunction with a=20 > "sister station". And another could be a ground station=20 > firing up to a helicopter hovering high enough to relay the signal. >=20 > =20 > We used to do RA feeds over ISDN 2B (~128K) with fairly good=20 > results. I think the codec makes all the difference. =20 >=20 > If all else fails, tape the event a drive the tapes "quickly"=20 > to someplace that can air them. =20 >=20 > > I want to get about 500kb/s uplink BW from the middle of=20 > the desert=20 > > in > Nevada, temporary installation. What are my options? >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev >=20 _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev