Re: hacknight - roofnet
Matt Westervelt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Our 'testing' was very superficial. The boxes came up and routed packets with no user-intervention. We were able to put a gateway up by changing a line in a configuration file. Our biggest hurdle was flashing the stylistics with the tools we had available. If you would like to participate at a HackNight Jim, you're more than welcome to come to one. My guess is that everyone would love to hear your input on every issue presented. -matt Jim Thompson wrote: > Matt Westervelt wrote: > >> Well, we tested it out with 3 stylistics and a couple of soekris boxes. >> We were able to ping all the members of the network, and route >> traffic out of the gateway node. > > > I'd hope for something more solid than ICMP as a "robustness" test. > >> One change that I noticed that seems particularly interesting is the >> ability to act as a mesh node (in adhoc) while also acting as an >> Infrastructure master. > > > But not with an Intersil-based card. > >> Another is that click no longer requires patching your kernel to run. > > > Click has been available as a user-mode version for quite some time. > What is different is that roofnet now uses this user-mode Click by > default. > > jim > _______________________________________________ > Talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk