Re: Off topic - personal problem in VT
Jim Thompson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ralph Sims wrote: > But doesn't this still give a 500' run? It seems that this equates to > splicing the two lengths together, albeit in the hub rather than one > "spliced" Ethernet run. A 'hub' in the middle would be problematic. A 'switch' in the middle would be "OK" (but non-optimal, see previous msgs). > I seem to recall that some network interfaces might > not be able to drive the signals past 100 meters. It got more to do with the ability to signal collisions. _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk