Re: Off topic - personal problem in VT
Fred Weston <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jim Thompson wrote: > 100m (328') is the "textbook" max length of Ethernet, but this has a > lot more to do with signaling collisions than the ability to correctly > drive signals on the wire. > > Put a switch (or full-duplex adapter) on each end, and "collisions" > become impossible. That's interesting. So you're basically saying that if you eliminate the possibility of collisions on the wire, you can run ethernet much further than 100 meters? Do you have any idea what the max "transmission" length is? _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk