RE: WiFi coverage of low density residential communities?
"Ken Meyer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brad -- Can it possibly be that, here in the 21st century, you have not yet absorbed how a mailing list works, or do I misinterpret your question? Just to be sure you understand: when you sign-up for a mail list, you will receive copies of ALL of the mail that is submitted to that list by you personally (a confirmation that your mail has gone through) and that submitted by any other member of the list. That is how everyone is enabled to contribute what each may know to the discussion, and to enable everyone to receive information of general interest. Of course, once you find someone that you wish to have a detailed conversation with, that you may think will not be of interest to, or appropriate to share with, the entire group, you may send mail to that individual alone and hope that he/she will be inclined to make the effort to respond to you (they usually will). However, mail lists may be configured differently, so that different things happen when you click on "Reply", and even "Reply All". Sometimes a "Reply" will be directed to the group only, and sometimes to the individual poster only. "Reply All" may apply both the individual and the group addresses to the "To-field" in the mail form, or it may send just to the group. There are rationales for these differences, but they are not material here (and there's really not much you can do about it, given the typical nature of System Administrators). The seattlewireless.net lists transmit messages to the entire group, and only the group, whatever choice you make. If you want to correspond "off-line" with just the poster of a message you are responding to, you need to copy his address out of the ORIGINAL message, BEFORE you click on "Reply" (where it disappears), and then paste that address in place of the group's address in the new message form that is created for your response. On other lists I belong to, "Reply All" will fill-in both the individual's and the group's addresses, and you have to choose which to delete, if any. It may be annoying for some to receive two messages in response to theirs: both the individual's address and the group copies. On the other hand, if the individual uses the digest (the batch form of responses from the list), I will often include him/her individually, so that they will see the message sooner, and it will not be buried in a perhaps long list of messages in the digest. There's an art to everything, and there is value added if you understand it. By the way, if you are not satisfied with this group, please follow the link at the bottom of every message to the page where you can unsubscribe. Don't just post a general message to the group in the nature of "Please unsubscribe me". That is very bad form in e-list circles and may earn you a rude response or two. I hope that I have not told you a bunch of things you already know well; there's no attempt here to be condescending -- only informative in a methodical manner. Ken Meyer -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of brad williamson Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:18 AM To: SeattleWireless Talk List; 'SeattleWireless Talk List' Subject: RE: WiFi coverage of low density residential communities? Ralph, Why do I seem to be getting responses to questions from someone else? This is the fourth one I've recieved from Seattlewireless in a week? I did attempt to get involved with Seattlewireless Talk last week, but having almost nothing to do with the mail I've been getting in my mailbox. I never asked, for instance, about "wifi coverage of low density residential communities", the subject of this email. Thanks for any help clearing this up, B Williams On Thu, 19 May 2005 08:51:00 -0700, "Ralph Sims" <[email protected]> said: > I don't know how low-density the City is thinking about. > > http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002280448_wifi19.html > > > Dense metro area examples like city of Spokane's 100 blocks > > of WiFi differ from the low density of residential > > communities. Has anyone references covering applications of > > implementing WiFi coverage for low density residential > > communities who have not been able to receive DSL? _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk