Re: 802.16d vs 64-point OFDM MIMO

Hi Bob,

Required coverage is about 25km radius, user base is greater than
5000. 50/50 share of voice and data. Mobility is not required for the
next one year. Expected ARPU is USD240.00. Main marketing barrier is
price of CPE otherwise the intial cost. And of course NLOS is needed.
If you need any other info do let me know.

Yup definately an ashton martin would do :P

Thanks,
Faisal

On 6/23/05, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> You aren't supplying enough information about your market objectives such as
> density, package of services, mobility factors, types of services, expected
> ARPU, etc.
> 
> What you need is something between a bicycle and a rolls Royce. ; ^)
> 
> Robert (Bob) Syputa, BSEE, MBA
> www.WiMAXPro.com
> [email protected]
> 206-367-6931
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Faisal Rahman" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 4:40 PM
> Subject: 802.16d vs 64-point OFDM MIMO
> 
> 
> hi,
> 
> I'm planning a new platform transition for Wireless Broadband in
> congested urban setting. Currently we own licenses of 25Mhz spectrum
> in 1.4Ghz band and 24Mhz spectrum in 600Mhz band. I have an option of
> manufacturing equipment of my choice. Common to everyone my priorities
> are cpe cost, coverage and QoS. Now my product choices are:
> 
> 1. 802.16d
> 2. 64-point OFDM MIMO 20Mhz channel size (something like a pre-802.11n)
> 
> running at the frequencies mentioned above.
> 
> Can someone tell me which would be a better option for me and why?
> 
> Thanks,
> Faisal
> _______________________________________________
> Talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
_______________________________________________
Talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk