Re: Recomendations for AP
Ken <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/24/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > WEP's weaknesses are well known but for voice applications it's probably still provides sufficient confidentiality in most environments. If sufficent confidentiality is no confidentiality then yes I would agree. -Ken > > On Friday, February 24, 2006, at 05:03PM, Dimitris Kogias <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Dejan Nikic wrote: > >> hmm the proxim AP4000 looks good, but it seems a bit hard to find on the > >> net. I found only one place for $380, which is a good price. Any tips > >> on the security setup of these. The phones we're trying to use should > >> support WEP, do you think this is sufficient? > > > >WEP is broken, so if you care about security you need either phones that > >can do WPA/WPA2 (preferably with AES support) or phones where the VoIP > >application protocol itself is secure (secure SIP and SRTP for example). > > > >I'm aware of wired (ethernet) SIP phones that implement this, but not > >sure about WiFi phones. > > > >D. > >_______________________________________________ > >Talk mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- Ken Caruso [email protected] _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk