Re: Recomendations for AP

Ken <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/24/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> WEP's weaknesses are well known but for voice applications it's probably still provides sufficient confidentiality in most environments.

If sufficent confidentiality is no confidentiality then yes I would agree.

-Ken

>
> On Friday, February 24, 2006, at 05:03PM, Dimitris Kogias <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Dejan Nikic wrote:
> >> hmm the proxim AP4000 looks good, but it seems a bit hard to find on the
> >> net.  I found only one place for $380, which is a good price.  Any tips
> >> on the security setup of these. The phones we're trying to use should
> >> support WEP, do you think this is sufficient?
> >
> >WEP is broken, so if you care about security you need either phones that
> >can do WPA/WPA2 (preferably with AES support) or phones where the VoIP
> >application protocol itself is secure (secure SIP and SRTP for example).
> >
> >I'm aware of wired (ethernet) SIP phones that implement this, but not
> >sure about WiFi phones.
> >
> >D.
> >_______________________________________________
> >Talk mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>


--
Ken Caruso
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.