Re: Recomendations for AP
Todd Boyle <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> WEP's weaknesses are well known Is the security on 900mhz or 2.4gz cordless phones much better? 98% of the things people say are SPAM anyways, pushing one thing or another. Nobody even opens their mouth, without a reason. Don't we want people to be listening? Let 'em listen. On the other hand, we need to listen in on these guys, http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Brian+L.+Roberts%22+Notebaert&num=30 Strong privacy serves only the powerful. Privacy doesn't serve most peoples' best interest. The Repubs are on Bushs' case over the NSA. Gee I wonder why. Todd At 05:50 PM 2/24/2006, [email protected] wrote: >Real world usage, Ken. Real world. Very, very few environments will see >someone bother to run WEPCrack on a voice stream. > > >On 2/24/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >> WEP's weaknesses are well known but for voice applications it's > probably still provides sufficient confidentiality in most environments. > > > >If sufficent confidentiality is no confidentiality then yes I would agree. _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk