Re: Impressions of Engenius ECB-8610?

"Fred Weston" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
My general concensus was that IAS doesn't work too well/at all for
WPA/802.1X.  This was on 2000, but I'd imagine it hasn't changed too
much between 2000/2003.  Most everyone I know that is using radius
agrees that steel-belted radius is the way to go.  Unfortunately, it's
expensive...

On 10/26/06, Devin McBride <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you find a good tutorial for getting radius to 'work' using server 2003 for wireless clients, please feel free to share...I have followed the articles at MSDN numerous times to no avail.  The article is written for WEP - but i need it for WPA/WPA2.
>
> Thanks,
> DM
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] on behalf of Mark Dueck
> Sent: Thu 10/26/2006 5:46 PM
> To: SeattleWireless Talk List
> Subject: Re: Impressions of Engenius ECB-8610?
>
> But I've read up on forums that some guys got WDS
> to work using WPA.  Wonder what that was about then..
>
> So what are my options then?  WEP is so insecure,
> and these are links in the city.  One Omni, and
> then 2 of these CB3+ to act as CPE's.  It's a
> small Medical University.  I wanted to setup the
> 3 locations to be on the same network.
>
> I guess I could do a radius server.  Have tried
> to get one working, but not successful so far.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
> At 06:31 PM 10/26/2006, you wrote:
> >Mark Dueck wrote:
> > > I just bought 3 Engenius 3054 CB3 Plus Deluxe -
> > > 200mW 802.11g Client Bridge  from Jefatech,
> > > hoping to connect them in WDS mode using WPA for security.
> > >
> > > Will this not work then?
> > >
> >
> >WDS does not support WPA only WEP, some APs can be a WPA AP to clients
> >and also a WDS repeater. But they cannot do WPA between WDS nodes. In
> >regards to the discussion about WDS sucking or being unreliable, it
> >works but has great impact on performance. You are creating a big
> >wireless broadcast domain and all radios involved (AP, WDS and client)
> >are operating on the same channel. There is a good summary of WDS here:
> >
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Distribution_System
> >
> >-Ken
> >[email protected]
> >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > At 04:44 PM 10/26/2006, you wrote:
> > >
> > >> Speaking of WDS, I've gotten it running between Apple and Trendnet
> > >> products and for my particular need it works great.  However I've
> > >> heard about lots of problems with WDS in general.
> > >>
> > >> Shawn
> > >>
> > >> ----Message d'origine----
> > >> De: [email protected]
> > >> Date: 26.10.2006 19:45
> > >> À: "SeattleWireless Talk List"<[email protected]>
> > >> Objet: Re: Impressions of Engenius ECB-8610?
> > >>
> > >> Hmm.  I know Cisco has their own WDS implementation, I think it's
> > >> proprietary, but I've heard good things about it.  $200/ap is a
> > >> lot
> > >> more attractive to me than $600/ap though.  :-/
> > >>
> > >> On 10/25/06, Bryan Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> The last I knew (and also because of bad experiences with) NOBODY
> > >>>
> > >> has
> > >>
> > >>> made WDS work correctly. Get a GOOD warranty, in writing.
> > >>>
> > >>> BLS
> > >>>
> > >>> Fred Weston wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Just looked at Engenius' site for the first time in quite a
> > >>>>
> > >> while and
> > >>
> > >>>> noticed they now support WDS with the ECB-8610:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://www.engeniustech.com/datacom/products/details.aspx?
> > >>>>
> > >> id=182
> > >>
> > >>>> Wondering if anybody has any good/bad first hand experience
> > >>>>
> > >> with them,
> > >>
> > >>>> especially with the WDS feature.
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Talk mailing list
> > >>>> [email protected]
> > >>>> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Talk mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Talk mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Talk mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >> Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.7/488 - Release Date: 10/19/2006
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Talk mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
> > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Talk mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.7/488 - Release Date: 10/19/2006
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.