Re: refresh-recurse in lastout: possible improvement?

Thanks for your reply!

[amb-Uxr6IM1mbv2TY6FTCsQk+9Bc4/[email protected] (Andrew M. Bishop), 10 Oct 2006 18:38:11 +0100]:
                                              ^^^^^|^^^^^
---------------------------------------------------'

Is this time stamp correct?  I only got it today, i.e., Oct. 23rd.

Anyway:

> > Alternatively, it would already be an improvement if selecting that
> > link in the LASTOUT index led to a page stating that this links
> > represents a recursive selection of items that can be reached starting
> > from some URL (http://www.pmsf.de/pub/cmucl/doc/cmu-user/ in the above
> > example) that is then linked to.
> 
> This would be possible except that there is no way to determine that
> the link was followed to see what pages were fetched and not to
> request the pages in the first place.  Following the link in the index
> is exactly the same as making the request in the first place.

I thought that, for these cases, the index should not contain the URL
that was requested but something different; e.g.
<http://localhost:8080/index-display/refresh-recurse/?url=http://www.pmsf.de/pub/cmucl/doc/cmu-user/;depth=5;limit=http://www.pmsf.de/pub/cmucl/doc/cmu-user/;images=Y;frames=Y>
for the original URL of
<http://localhost:8080/refresh-recurse/?url=http://www.pmsf.de/pub/cmucl/doc/cmu-user/;depth=5;limit=http://www.pmsf.de/pub/cmucl/doc/cmu-user/;images=Y;frames=Y>.
The part /index-display/ would inform WWWOFFLE what kind of page to
create.

Regards, and thanks for your work on WWWOFFLE -

Albert.