Re: orphaned cache elements
amb-Uxr6IM1mbv2TY6FTCsQk+9Bc4/[email protected] (Andrew M. Bishop)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wwwoffle.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Micha <[email protected]> writes: > amb-Uxr6IM1mbv2TY6FTCsQk+9Bc4/[email protected] (Andrew M. Bishop): > > This is correct, only the pages that you ask to be deleted will be > > deleted. Any other pages that are referenced from those pages will > > stay in the cache. > > Just for clarity: > I have at least the possibility to delete the whole domain to get > rid of anything. > If i delete a selection of pages only, however, there's a chance to > produce 'orphans'. So far this is all about the same domain, not > about 'adds' from other hosts. > > I guess that accordingly deleting a whole domain doesn't delete any > dependent 'add' domains, which were called by the first domain only, > accordingly ? > So there would be another source of orphans. Orphans are orphans, it does not matter where the links are, within one domain or between domains, there will be orphaned pages left in the cache. > > No, there is nothing in the purge settings that will allow you to > > delete the content that is linked to from a particular page. > So keeping a cache clean works best with fast general expiring, or > some amount of manual work. I think that the best way to keep the size of the cache down (if you cannot spare the disk space) is to set a purge age. This can be different for different domanis, but setting an age and then using the purge feature will remove files that you don't look at. -- Andrew. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew M. Bishop amb-Uxr6IM1mbv2TY6FTCsQk+9Bc4/[email protected] http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/ WWWOFFLE users page: http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/wwwoffle/version-2.8/user.html