Re: xinetd bug or new DoS attack?

Steve G <[email protected]> writes:

> Its been my experience that its rare to hit the per process limit
> in most situations, but it is there. This is a different problem
> than cps.

Ah, ok, thanks for clearing this up.

That might BTW be a reason to pre-fork a master server per service when
the load can be high (which is what tcpsvd and tcpserver to by design -
they handle only one service, so you get to run one daemon per service).

-- 
Matthias Andree

Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95