Re: xinetd feature: daemons that listen on multiple ports

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:23:24PM -0700, Steve G wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> All that's truly needed in xinetd is the ability to define
> an address list for the bind parameter. Just that one thing
> would get us the most flexibility for the effort. This is
> what other inetd's do.

I think you do not understand the feature I am proposing.
This is NOT simply binding to multiple interfaces.  This is
to handle services that listen on multiple ports, with 
multiple protocols.  This is NOT a feature that any existing
inetd currently implements.

Rob