Re: post-2.3.12 pending stuff in my private work area

Steve G <[email protected]> writes:

> Yesterday you said you recommend NOLIBWRAP for a flag and
> then call tcpd so people have a consistent setup. In that
> scenario, the patch to xinetd doesn't even come into play
> since NOLIBWRAP is given.

These are orthogonal. I'd like the libwrap stuff for myself, and the
"consistent options" configuration when I'm documenting other software
that is launched by some inetd.

> But back to your original post for this thread. Why don't
> you send Rob the patch so the portability enhancements can
> start to be integrated? I think we're ready for those
> changes. :)

OK

-- 
Matthias Andree