Re: Running xinetd 2.3.12
Steve G <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.xinetd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You really put a lot into that e-mail and its too big to respond to everything at once. >Last, is 'linux/time.h' required? configure.in is checking This is a bug in the xinetd build. An applications should not get that intimate with the OS. I think it was put there back around the 2.0 kernel 2.2 transition to detect a libc 5 problem. We all run glibc 2 or higher now so this hack should be deleted. Besides, if anyone was running a libc 5 system, xinetd would never compile with all the IPv6 stuff. The short summary of your whole experience. I am running a version of xinetd without the final 120K sized patch...so that would be pre-2.3.12 cvs. I cannot duplicate the problem based on what you've given me. I tried setting things up like you have and I don't get segfaults. As Matthias said, it would be helpful if you can track down the addresses with gdb or valgrind. With a line number, I can have a patch for you quickly. -Steve Grubb __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com