Software Patent Loser Volvo lobbying for Uncommon Position
[email protected] (PILCH Hartmut) Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:35:06 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.aful.patents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
PRESS RELEASE FFII -- [ Europe / economy / ICT ] =============================================================================== Volvo Letter to EP: Software Patent Loser Lobbying for Council Position =============================================================================== The representative office of Volvo Motors in Brussels has sent in recent days a paper to members of the European Parliament, dated 15 March 2005, which calls them to support the Council's "Common Position". The letter reads like a copied and pasted from similar letters sent by other large Swedish companies, consisting mainly of unsubstantiated bold statements about the importance of patents and the "devastating effects" that any serious limitation of patentability would have. A look at Volvo's patenting activities shows that Volvo has been unsuccessfully trying to obtain a few broad and trivial patents on ways to arrange a car's interior and an information display panel, but that on the whole this is a very peripheral activity for Volvo that does not affect its overall business in any way. It looks more like colleagues from large corporate patent departments doing one another a favour by participating in letter-writing actions. In June 2003, Jean-Pierre Courniou, R&D director of Renault and president of the "Club Informatique des Grandes Entreprises Françaises" (CIGREF = Computing Club of the Large French Companies) declared software patents to be a great danger for the automobile industry and summarised: "For me and for CIGREF, the response is: no, we don't want patentability". According to FFII's research, Volvo owns far fewer software patents than Renault and is definitely on the losing end of the software patent game in every respect. Hartmut Pilch, president of FFII, comments: "It is clear that Volvo is merely being used by a network of corporate patent lawyers for political statements that have nothing to do with the interests of Volvo. MEPs should put hard questions to Volvo and insist on a talk with their board level. As long as there is no apology from Volvo's board, the rest of us should punish Volvo for allowing abuse of its name by a kind of political activism that is harmful to the industry and consumers at large. Please read Volvo's patent shameless patent claims and lobbying letters and remember them next time you think of buying or renting a car." ========================================================================== Extra information ========================================================================== The letter and Volvo's patent claims can be found at http://wiki.ffii.org/Volvo050315En ========================================================================== Contact ========================================================================== Hartmut Pilch and Holger Blasum (Munich Office) info at ffii org tel. 0049-89-18979927 Erik Josefsson (Brussels Office) erjos at ffii org tel. 0032-2-7396262 Jonas Maebe: jmaebe at ffii org tel. 0032-485-369645 Dieter Van Uytvanck: [email protected] tel. 0031-6-275-87910 ========================================================================== About FFII -- http://www.ffii.org ========================================================================== The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) is a non-profit association registered in several European countries, which is dedicated to the spread of data processing literacy. FFII supports the development of public information goods based on copyright, free competition, open standards. More than 500 members, 1,400 companies and 80,000 supporters have entrusted the FFII to act as their voice in public policy questions concerning exclusion rights (intellectual property) in data processing. The FFII maintains offices in Munich and Brussels and national supporter groups in most European countries.