This Takes the Cake
Seth Johnson <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Aug 2004 04:54:26 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists,gmane.org.aful.patents |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ten abstract laws, combined in code, patented. Anybody else finding that whenever you hear anything from "ethicists" these days, you're disgusted with what they're doing? Seth > http://www.itworldcanada.com/Pages/Docbase/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=idgml-4b6e7ba7-0ecc-47b8-8bd4-7c7baa29be4a Ethical artificial intelligence patented Robots to follow 10 mandates that focus on virtues, exclude vices By: ComputerWorld Canada staff ComputerWorld Canada (20 Aug 2004) As movie-goers flock to the theatres to see the recently-released futuristic thriller I, Robot, ethical behaviour in artificial intelligence (AI) is getting a boost with a new patent issued last month by the U.S Patent and Trademark Office. The patent, Inductive Inference Affective Language Analyzer Simulating AI (# 6,587,846) introduces the concept of the Ten Ethical Laws of Robotics. According to a statement from inventor John LaMuth, the patent represents Âthe first AI system incorporating ethical/motivational terms, enabling a computer to reason and speak ethically, serving in roles specifying sound human judgment. The Ten Ethical Laws expand upon Isaac AsimovÂs Three Laws of Robotics, an idea found in his book, I, Robot, published in 1950, which this summerÂs movie is based upon. The movie is set in Chicago in the year 2035, where robots are part of everyday life and everyone trusts them, except one slightly paranoid detective (played by Will Smith). He investigates what he alone believes is a crime perpetrated by a robot. The case leads him to discover a far more frightening threat to the human race. AsimovÂs laws state that a robot may not injure a human or, through inaction, allow a human to come to harm; it must obey orders humans give it except where such orders would conflict with the first law; and it must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second law. According to LaMuthÂs statement, AsimovÂs laws donÂt quite cut it. ÂThis cursory system of safeguards remains simplistic in its dictates, leaving open the specific details for implementing such a system. But the Ten Ethical Laws remedy that shortcoming, he said, because they are written as a Âformal mandate, focusing on virtues to the necessary exclusion of corresponding vices. ÂWith such ethical safeguards firmly in place, the AI computer is formally prohibited from expressing the corresponding vices, allowing for a truly flawless simulation of virtue, according to the statement. -- DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders! New Yorkers for Fair Use http://www.nyfairuse.org [CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of exclusive rights.