New Approaches to Exclusive Rights at WIPO
Seth Johnson <[email protected]> Mon, 04 Oct 2004 17:05:30 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists,gmane.org.aful.patents |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Random-bits] WIPO backs Development Agenda, and new approaches to innovation andcreativity Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:59:09 -0400 From: James Love <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Over the past two years, there has been a growing movement to change WIPO as an institution. This includes growing civil society participation in some of the WIPO committees, the summer 2003 request that WIPO hold a major meeting on open collaborative efforts to create public goods, two TACD meetings on the WIPO Work Program and the Future of WIPO, an August 2004 proposal by Argentina and Brazil to change the WIPO charter and adopt a new work program and development agenda, and the recent Geneva Declaration on the Future of WIPO. (see http://www.cptech.org/ip/wipo/genevadeclaration.html) Today the WIPO General Assembly dramatically decided to advance the proposed "Development Agenda" for WIPO. As evidenced by the document setting out the proposal (WO/GA/31/11), and the debate, the "Development Agenda" is really two things. (1) a focus on the development aspects of intellectual property policy, and (2) a frontal challenge to the "more is better" approach to IP policies. One element of the ÂDevelopment Agenda is a new Treaty on Access to Knowledge and Technology. There are many other important elements. I would like to thank everyone who played an important role in the events that have caused a historic change in the WIPO culture and work program. Below are two documents. TodayÂs WIPO Decision on Agenda item 12 (the Development Agenda), and a note sent to WIPO from the Civil Society Coalition regarding the proposed Treaty on Access to Knowledge and Technology. Jamie Love <[email protected]> -------------------------- Agenda Item 12 Following discussions, the General Assembly adopts the following decision: Recalling that the relationship between development and intellectual property has continuously been raised in several multilateral fora; Taking into account the activities carried out by WIPO in the area of development; Bearing in mind the internationally agreed development goals, including those in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, the Programme of Action for the Least Developed Countries for the Decade 2001-2010, the Monterey Consensus, the Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, the Declaration of Principles and the Plan of Action of the first phase of the World Summit on the Information Society and the Sao Paulo Consensus adopted at UNCTAD XI; (1) The General Assembly welcomes the initiative for a development agenda and notes the proposals contained in document WO/GA/31/11. (2) The General Assembly decides to convene inter-sessional intergovernmental meetings to examine the proposals contained in document WO/GA/31/11, as well as additional proposals of Member States. To the extent possible, the meetings will be convened in conjunction with the 2005 session of the Permanent Committee on Cooperation for Development Related to Intellectual Property. The meetings, open to all Member States, will prepare a report by July 30, 2005, for the consideration of the next General Assembly. WIPO-accredited IGOs and NGOs are invited to participate as observers in the meetings. (3) The International Bureau shall undertake immediate arrangements in order to organize with other relevant multilateral organizations, including UNCTAD, WHO and UNIDO, WTO, a joint international seminar on Intellectual Property and Development, open to the participation of all stakeholders, including NGOs, civil society and academia. (4) The General Assembly decides to include this issue in its September 2005 session. -------- CSC statement- The Civil Society Coalition (CSC) represents twenty-six non-government organizations from twelve countries, North and South. Our members are concerned with a wide range of issues that are relevant to WIPO, including access to medicine, access to knowledge, and better mechanisms to support creativity activity. We thank WIPO for supporting our application for permanent NGO accreditation. We look forward to contributing to the debate over the development agenda for WIPO, and in particular, the proposed Treaty on Access to Knowledge and Technology. We suggest this Treaty include provisions on topics such as the following: 1. Implementation of Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, 2. Implementation of Articles 7,8 and 40 of the TRIPS regarding the control of anticompetitive practices and the transfer of technology 3. Global access to publicly funded research, 4. Mechanisms to promote openness, including support for new open access scholarly publishing models, open standards for software and Internet development, open databases, and other instruments of disseminating and transferring knowledge and technology, and other approaches that remove barriers to innovation, and support and empower collaborative approaches to innovation and creativity, 5. Minimum exceptions to patent and copyright laws which are needed to protect the visually impaired, libraries, educators, consumers, and Internet technologies, and which facilitate follow-on creative activities and innovation by authors, performers, researchers and inventors, working both as individuals and within creative communities, 6. Provisions in the Patent Cooperation Treaty to protect standards making organizations, and to better enable collaborative efforts to create public goods, such as databases or standards that will be free of patent claims. 7. Mechanisms, such as those found in the Treaty of Europe, to promote technology transfer and scientific collaboration between richer and lesser developed member states, We note also there are important topics such as the misappropriation of social and public goods, both modern and traditional, concentrated ownership and control of knowledge, technology and biological resources, and unfair treatment of authors, inventors and other creative persons and communities, and new trade frameworks to support research and development that should be discussed. -- James Love | Consumer Project on Technology http://www.cptech.org | mailto:[email protected] P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 200036 voice +1.202.387.8030 | fax +1.202.234.5176 _______________________________________________ Random-bits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/random-bits