Re: [hm-staff] Re: The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy

hi Izumi,

APNIC currently allocates IPv6 addresses to organisations that have
private 'closed' networks. We recognise that this is not documented
in the current policy and agree that there should be a clause to cover
this.


Son

APNIC

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Izumi Okutani wrote:

> From: Geoff Huston <gih-pWIpc5MZKA/[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [GLOBAL-V6]The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy
> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:11:58 +1000
> 
> > 
> > >I'm wondering how we can proceed from here. Is it just a matter of
> > >confirming the actual situation with the RIRs, or do we need another
> > >process to confirm the interpretation?
> > 
> > 
> > Personally I would suggest that it may be worth an effort to formally
> > amend the policy and specifically include criteria for access to
> > IPv6 address blocks from the RIR or NIR as a PI allocation without
> > a need for announcement for such blocks on the global Internet
> > (which is what I infer from your description of a 'closed' network)
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> 
> I wasn't sure if this is considered as a matter of interpretation or
> the policy amendment, but since it's an undefined area, I agree, we
> should go through a formal process.
>  
> 
> Izumi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> global-v6 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> _______________________________________________
> Hostmaster-staff mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/hostmaster-staff
> 

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6