Re: [hm-staff] Re: The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy

Hi Leo,


I agree that it is difficult to fix the evaluation criteria when the
policy is ambiguous. Thanks for sharing the situation in the RIPE
region.


Izumi

From: leo vegoda <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [hm-staff] Re: [GLOBAL-V6]The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:33:02 +0200

> Hi Izumi,
> 
> Izumi Okutani <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Thanks for your comment and sharing APNIC's position, Son.
> >
> >It would be nice to learn the situation in other regions too.  I
> >assume RIRs are working very closely in request evaluation as well,
> >but perhaps, we need further discussions if the situation differs by
> >regions?
> 
> As has been noted, the current policy is not clear. This makes things 
> difficult for both those requesting address space and those evaluating 
> requests. There are no clear criteria for approving requests for a 
> closed use network. Consequently, decisions on requests for address 
> space for private networks tend to be made on a case-by-case basis. We 
> have not had many requests for space for closed networks. This is no 
> doubt partly because the policy text can be interpreted to mean that 
> such requests are not justified.
> 
> This is certainly not ideal and we would support a change to the policy 
> text that clarified its meaning.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> leo vegoda
> RIPE NCC
> Registration Services Manager
> 

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6