Re: IPv6 policy at LACNIC( was: RE: IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
Carlos Friacas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello all,
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Carlos Morgado wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:02:53PM -0800, Michel Py wrote:
>
> >
> > Bottom line is, it costs less to defragment the IPv4 space than it does
> > to deploy IPv6 (remember that all the apps have to be re-written).
if the apps were correctly writen only the APIs need to be re-written.
there is a 5-star example: gnomemeeting (http://www.gnomemeeting.org)
as far as i was told only 10 lines were changed to enable IPv6 on that
particular app.
> I hear there's 2 shareware programs left, everything else has been adapted
> ;)
nice sense of humour...
that is still a big problem, but unfortunately we are yet to see most of
the ISPs:
+ doing BGP4+ with other ISPs locally (at some IXPs)
+ getting native IPv6 transit from their upstream(s)
(yes, the *real* problem here is still few carriers having it...)
regards,
./Carlos
-------------- IPv6 -> http://www.ip6.fccn.pt
Wide Area Network Workgroup, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN
FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional http://www.fccn.pt
"Internet is just routes (131009/449), naming (millions) and... people!"
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6