Re: IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region

German and all,

  I wonder when if ever LACNIC will be seeking advisory input from
the stakeholders/users in their region?  I also wonder if LACNIC
does seek such input, that the desires and requirements of those
participating stakeholders/users will be adheared to in a responsible
and direct way?

German Valdez wrote:

> Hi Izumi
>
> sorry for delay
>
> It is intention of the RIR to work in common policies, like the IPv6 one,
> when this is possible.
>
> Nevertheless, this IPv6 policy proposal is the result of a regional need.
> So far has accomplished all the step of our Policy Development Process.
>
> Even though common policies may work well they are not bindig for the RIR.
>
> We are aware that this proposal is broken a common policy. For this reason
> we are sharing this criteria with the Global IPv6 community.
>
> This 45 days period of comment  (which ends at january 23rd) is not part of
> the policy development process, however is a faculty of LACNIC's Board to
> do this. The reason was to recieve more comments from the global community
> before the Board made a decision.
>
> Regards
>
> German Valdez
> Policy Liaison
> LACNIC
>
> At 12:07 AM 1/7/2004, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> >It had been my understanding that IPv6 policy would be co-ordinated
> >among the RIRs, but this seems to imply a regional policy like IPv4.
> >
> >That's also one method of the policy process that's proved to work
> >well, but it should at least be a concious decision by the RIRs(or its
> >communities).
> >
> >Could someone from the RIRs share the position about this?
> >
> >Izumi
> >JPNIC
> >
> >From: German Valdez <[email protected]>
> >Subject: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
> >Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:16:29 -0300
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > FYI LACNIC is calling for last comments for new policies to be applied
> > next
> > > year. One of this policies is a new criteria for IPv6 Initial allocation.
> > >
> > > This proposal is the result of the analysis of the LACNIC IPv6 WG and the
> > > discussion held during our Open Policy Forum in The Havana, Cuba
> > >
> > > You can review this proposal at http://lacnic.net/en/last-call.html
> > >
> > > On december 9th we started a 45 days period for comments for these
> > > policies, including the IPv6 one. Comments will be received through our
> > > policy public list [email protected], subscription to this list is open
> > > at http://lacnic.net/en/lists.html. Any comments are welcomed.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > German Valdez
> > > Policy Liaison
> > > LACNIC
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > global-v6 mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >global-v6 mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
>
> _______________________________________________
> global-v6 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email protected]
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801


_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6