Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-01-20, at 22.56, Jeff Williams wrote: >> >> It is my understanding that the extent of regional differences >> accomodated in the v6 policy had never been publicly discussed nor >> stated. All I want to do is clarify this part, which was why I wished >> to confirm whether there had been any agreement among the RIRs. > > Seems to me from following these ML's that the RIR's staff are > making or attempting to make policy without any or adequate > verifiable measured consensus of the participating stakeholders/users. > I know our members in the different regions feel this way and I have > ask for but not yet received any confirmation of a demonstrated > measured consensus documentation from all regions.. > How many of you members are going to the RIPE meeting next week? How many of your members are registered as LIRs in the RIPE region? - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQA4k1aarNKXTPFCVEQKYuwCdEuSz9vYPcw4jXKa46hapn6wT2VkAoMue vcsiTZrmRnJygAr4YHHuWFUv =hQdE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6