Re: IPv6 Allocation Policy
Simon Leinen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pekka Savola writes:
[...]
> It could be argued to be too low for those who specialize in very
^^^^^^^
I think you meant to say "too high".
> specific fields, and do not have many direct customers, but a lot of
> "last-mile" customers, for example:
> - national research networks whose only direct customers are the
> universities (or similar) (which may have tens of thousands of
> users each, but there may not be 200 universities in a country)
> - transit ISP's whose only direct customers are other ISP's
> - others?
Maybe the requirement could be better formulated in terms of "number
of sites (/48) aggregated" or "number of Logical IP Subnets (/64)
aggregated".
--
Simon.
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6