RE: IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region

Hi Randy,

I think is do understand that the isp community would benefit from some
common points in the policy of all the regions, such as the size of assigned
address block. However, i don't see it clearly in other aspects, such as the
assignment criteria.

So, do you think that the isps would benefit from a homogenous policy in all
the aspects or they would just require homogeneity in some specific aspects
of the policy (such size of the address blocks assigned).

Thanks, marcelo

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]En nombre de Randy Bush
> Enviado el: miercoles, 21 de enero de 2004 23:06
> Para: Anne Lord
> CC: [email protected]
> Asunto: Re: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
>
>
> > It is useful to observe that this policy is globally co-ordinated
> > rather than a global policy: there were never any agreements by
> > any RIR staff that there would be a single global policy.
>
> the more interesting, at least to me, question is whether or not
> there was such an understanding by the member isps of the various
> regions.  i think that many of those of us who do routing are
> indeed expecting a homogenous policy.  hence the creation of this
> mailing list.
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> global-v6 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
>

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6