Re: IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
Jeff Williams <[email protected]> Sun, 25 Jan 2004 04:03:29 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Organization | INEGroup Spokesman |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kurt and all, IPv6 was developed with public funds paid predominantly by US tax payers. Hence IPv6 is a PUBLIC resource. As such membership for any and all stakeholders is or must be assumed and unencumbered. Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2004-01-23, at 23.38, Randy Bush wrote: > > >> So, do you think that the isps would benefit from a homogenous policy > >> in > >> all the aspects or they would just require homogeneity in some > >> specific > >> aspects of the policy (such size of the address blocks assigned). > > > > i'll settle for what i can get. but prefix length and swamp locations > > are > > biggies. just think like a router. > > While I agree with Randy, and while I generally think that the current > situation with different policies in each region is bad, as it makes > people/companies go to the RIR that meets their needs the best - there > are also regional/local differences that to some extent need to be > catered for. Like what Marcelo says about allocation criteria. > > To make things worse, at least initially (and I think still) there > where quite different views in the regions on what the allocation > criteria should be. This was to some extent due the different > membership models of the various RIRs. I still have quite some sympathy > for the original RIPE LIR-WG proposal that anyone who was a member of > RIPE NCC would get an allocation (actually I think it was anyone who > applied - and given the current landslide that might have been a good > thing(tm) ). Yes, it would put a price on addresses. But if you really > need portable addressspace, you got to be this tall to ride... > > - - kurtis - > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 8.0.3 > > iQA/AwUBQBIlUqarNKXTPFCVEQJHlgCferB26d5C49/XZwjxneVAW7yMngUAoIcx > SlOhMS0S/jJqql+97CW2p7Kb > =v+f3 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > global-v6 mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6 Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [email protected] Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801 _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6