RE: IPv6 Allocation Policy
"Michel Py" <michel-nyboWHt8SIrJRljzj3WzodHdOEOI8IWic20RSKp2L0g@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <963621801C6D3E4A9CF454A1972AE8F5045860@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> |
Gert, > Gert Doering wrote: > Overall, they are being transit for 47 distinctive ASes, and > quite a number of them have individual /32s already, so there > really is a need for NORDUnet to have IPv6 addresses, and > preferrably not some that are coming from one of their customers. > Globally, there are a few more of those networks, but not > overly many, so I am convinced that we don't cause much harm > when permitting them to get address blocks. No argument here. NRENs do have the same kind of issue in the ARIN region too. Now, has NORDUnet applied for space and be denied it? Michel. _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6