Re: Re: I-DACTION:draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt

At 12:21 20/07/2005, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
><snip>
> >
> > Up to now, what has been investigated is what IPv6 can bring to the
> > network. I think another interesting approach is to start from a universal
> > numbering space and investigate what IPv6 could bring to it (with the
> > current technology or not) and to all its constituents. May be the way to
> > understand how to deploy IPv6 faster instead of selling it slowly?
>
>This is a completly different discussion and IPv6 is just one of many
>tools available. Problem is, are no use in trying to create lots of funky
>services if the communication wont work...  and no one (almost) want to
>use time and money on getting the communication to work without a service
>using it.

I am not sure I understand your comment. I am talking of IPv6 support of 
the universal numbering space, not of other tools. Problem IMHO is to 
understand where regidity is useful and where it impeaches solutions people 
would need to put your time and money into? I am always against exclusive 
and exclusion, whatever their good reasons, when this is possible. All the 
more in techniics and innovation. Just says that.

I see advantages in having /48 /56 /64 etc. thresholds in rates. Not really 
in technics. But I certainly see the technical con/pros why to use these 
threeshold, the same I see advantages in /128 and in InterfaceID Grids.

Or did I misread your comment?
Thank you.
jfc

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6