RE: IPv6 Allocation Policy
"Michel Py" <michel-nyboWHt8SIrJRljzj3WzodHdOEOI8IWic20RSKp2L0g@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <963621801C6D3E4A9CF454A1972AE8F504F80C@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> |
> Craig A. Huegen wrote: > So, in essence it calls for separate addressing to separate sites > with multiple ISP's at the same site. This company uses PA space > when only one provider is present at a site (smaller access points). Indeed the only safe solution you have today is multiple /32s, not because you need that much space, but because of filtering. If you cut a single /32 in pieces and announce, say a /36 for each continent it will be filtered to leave only the /32 pass, resulting in traffic from Asia to the US /36 hitting your Asia site and then you have to carry the traffic internally. Multiple /32s when a /44 would have been enough :-( Michel. _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6