RE: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN

 
> > G) a key thing is to limit the size of the swamp that would be 
> > created, or more specifically limit its growth. So it might 
> be a good 
> > idea to have a sunset clause in the policy, like it will have to be 
> > revisited in 2 years or when a certain allocation (or 
> allocation rate) threshold will be reached.
> 
> Somehow it is what I'm defining: A sunset based on a 
> technical solution availability.

Yes, the goal is similar, the means are differents.
The sunset clause I suggest specifically does not ask
those PI to be returned at some point in the future.

   - Alain.

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6