Re: [ppml] PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN

Hi Bill,

Clearly I guess we disagree on this. Having to renumber an enterprise
network in 5-6 years, in the worst case, is not again a production service,
most of the time is done more often.

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Bill Woodcock <[email protected]>
> Responder a: <[email protected]>
> Fecha: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
> Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]>
> CC: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Asunto: Re: [ppml] PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN
> 
>       On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> My proposal is having PI now everywhere, but those PI allocations
>> for multihoming should be temporary and those address blocks
>> returned to the RIRs after the new technical solution is
>> declared valid.
> 
> "Temporary" and "experimental" go together.
> "Permanent" and "production" go together.
> 
> Which do you want IPv6 to be?
> 
>                                 -Bill
> 




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Slides available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.



_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6