Re: IPv6 Allocation Policy

David Kessens <david-LXTkK8GSST62oZ/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.apnic.global-v6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michel,

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:30:42PM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
> > Craig A. Huegen wrote:
> > So, in essence it calls for separate addressing to separate sites
> > with multiple ISP's at the same site.  This company uses PA space
> > when only one provider is present at a site (smaller access
> > points).
> 
> Indeed the only safe solution you have today is multiple /32s, not
> because you need that much space, but because of filtering. If you
> cut a
> single /32 in pieces and announce, say a /36 for each continent it
> will
> be filtered to leave only the /32 pass, resulting in traffic from
> Asia
> to the US /36 hitting your Asia site and then you have to carry the
> traffic internally.

From what I see, there are very few people who filter on /32
boundaries. Operational practise seems slightly different from theory.

David K.
---
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.