RE: [narten-r/[email protected]: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]

I agree.
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Patrick W. Gilmore
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 12:10 AM
> To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Cc: Patrick W. Gilmore; shim6-wg; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; IETF Discussion; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [narten-r/[email protected]: PI addressing in IPv6 
> advances in ARIN]
> 
> On Apr 14, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> > On 14-apr-2006, at 16:57, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> >
> >> 60 voted in favor of moving forward with PI.  6 voted against.
> >
> > Wow, 10 to 1. Amazing.
> >
> > Even more amazing: 60 people who represent nobody but their own 
> > paycheck get to blow up the internet.
> >
> > Where is ICANN when you need it? This little experiment in 
> playground 
> > democracy has to end before people get hurt.
> 
> Wow, Iljitsch, I have never lost so much respect so quickly for  
> someone who was not flaming a specific person or using profanity.   
> Congratulations.
> 
> 
> Back on topic, it is not just those 60 people - the "playground"  
> appears to overwhelmingly agree with their position.  I know I do.
> 
> I am sorry your technical arguments have not persuaded us in 
> the past.  But I would urge you to stick to those, or at 
> least consider why we remain unconvinced, rather than devolve 
> into .. whatever that post was supposed to be.
> 
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
> 
>