Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: [ppml] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it less destructive
Tim Chown <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:28:43 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 07:15:15PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > > Based on observations in v4 land, there are sites that specifically > want to do something other than the first option, and I specifically > want to preclude them from doing so. > > For almost every site, a /48 is enough. For those for whom it's not > enough, they already want separable advertisements for TE purposes > (e.g., multiple data centers), so they need either multiple /48's or > tricks like above in any case. I think pekka already hinted at it, but people interested in this topic really should look at: http://www.iepg.org/march2006/BGP-2005.pdf for some analysis of a situation that could get worse. I think there's arguments both ways on this, but Geoff's talk was very interesting and enlightening. -- Tim/::1 _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6