Re: IPv6 Allocation Policy
David Kessens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michel, On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:30:42PM -0700, Michel Py wrote: > > Craig A. Huegen wrote: > > So, in essence it calls for separate addressing to separate sites > > with multiple ISP's at the same site. This company uses PA space > > when only one provider is present at a site (smaller access points). > > Indeed the only safe solution you have today is multiple /32s, not > because you need that much space, but because of filtering. If you cut a > single /32 in pieces and announce, say a /36 for each continent it will > be filtered to leave only the /32 pass, resulting in traffic from Asia > to the US /36 hitting your Asia site and then you have to carry the > traffic internally. From what I see, there are very few people who filter on /32 boundaries. Operational practise seems slightly different from theory. David K. --- _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6