Re: PI space under IPv6

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:31:15AM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
> 	Right, and that (the 192...) is analogous to what is
> 	being built for IPv6 as we speak. The salient point is
> 	that it (PI space) has the potential to be/is
> 	unaggregatable space. 

Indeed.  As has "provider aggregateable" space, if there are enough
"providers".

Which is why my short-term vision is more along the lines of "entities
that think their global routing table slot is important enough to undergo
some hassles" (read: become RIR member, sign international contracts, pay 
recurring fees) get one - and everybody else doesn't.

And indeed this is not something everybody will like - and hopefully,
there will be some other solution that will enable end-user multihoming / 
end-user network portability without requiring a "global BGP table slot".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  98999

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: [email protected]
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iQCVAwUBRa6kXKkuBuNlUUl1AQLy5AP/VYsgKcOnme6X4JAsITc3igQXx/w/mI13
oDdKVDbicYtLmaJfVpv7HJQQr/XxxlkdZmekHoaGEZpwzGT4kdktSjqCsvmV6wNf
B3xV31GjD+bn+auvN/7IBbEjKqZSOVWka6ji5eFs9Z4LiDdqLJF7LKTN9FQypbCM
enu+7Eg6qqA=
=HC/E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----