Re: IPv6 Allocation Policy
Pekka Savola <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Craig A. Huegen wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2003, Pekka Savola wrote: > > > Because I pay ISP's to bring traffic to me. If I announce the /32 > > > everywhere, then I have to build and manage my own Internet backbone to > > > carry the traffic globally (in parallel with my internal/clean WAN). That > > > amounts to paying two service providers to carry the traffic where I need > > > it. > > > > I don't quite understand this, so I take it there may be some unstated > > assumptions here. > > > > You mean that if you have two physically separate sites with each e.g. /33 > > block, and would announce the /32 block at both points, you would have to > > have more extensive & expensive internal WAN (carrying the other half, /33 > > to the other physical location) to the -- and your WAN could not handle > > it? > > > > This seems to call for separate addresses to separate sites under > > different ISPs. Oh.. that was called PA. > > This company I know has 5 primary Internet route points, one for the west > coast of the US, one for the east coast of the US, one in western Europe, > one in Australia, and one in northern Asia. Each has a minimum of 2 > providers, some have 4. If this company advertises the /32 from each SP > at each route point, traffic is going to jump to that company at the first > possible point. This particular company has the greatest majority of its > traffic arriving at the west coast of the US. BGP doesn't exactly have > the best intelligence when it comes to network proximity, so there are > cases when a European ISP might end up sending traffic to this company's > western US presence only to have the company's WAN backhaul it to Europe > for its final destination. > > So, in essence it calls for separate addressing to separate sites with > multiple ISP's at the same site. This company uses PA space when only one > provider is present at a site (smaller access points). What is the percentage of the traffic in the known services, vs. the rest? IE. if e.g. the web and ftp servers were numbered using PA-based addresses from multiple ISPs (not that big a deal, there's only a limited number of such services), but the employee hosts etc. would use a company, globe-wide /32 address, would advertising the /32 in all the locations be a problem? Luckily enough we have Mobile IPv6 with Route Optimization ;-). -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6