RE: PI space under IPv6

"Sander Steffann" <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:11:07 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.org.apnic.global-v6
Organization Computel | Nederland.net
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,
 
> These allocation procedures do match what I say about all of it: Give
> address space to organizations that need it. It does FAR from conserve
> routing table slots though, which indeed is not something the 
> RIR's are involved with, but they should of course try a little IMHO.

Indeed.

To conserve routing table slots, just give a *single* big block of IPv6
addresses to organisations that want and need them. My routing table doesn't
care if an organisation has a /48 or a /27, it's just one slot. And I think
there are plenty IPv6 addresses for this. Giving multiple blocks to one
organisation is the worst that can happen. It saves addresses (of which we
have plenty), and it wastes routing slots (which we need to preserve).

- Sander

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6