Re: PI space under IPv6

> 	Why, exactly? The distinction is real, and points to
> 	real and looming problems with the (IPv6) routing system.

PI is just a requirement from users. The infrustructure to support it needs fixing,
hence there is this discussion. Actually people asking for PI are more concerned
with a pool of IDs to name/control/monitor their items/things and less so with
routing. So split ID/locator. Give IDs to people. Build routing on locators. ISPs
will follow the new architecture. Opposing ISPs will be naturally replaced by new
willing ones. 

Thanks,
Peter

--- David Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:51:41AM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
> > I really wish people could stop using the phrases PI and PA when talking 
> > about IPv6.
> 
> 	Why, exactly? The distinction is real, and points to
> 	real and looming problems with the (IPv6) routing system. 
> 
> 	--dmm
> > _______________________________________________
> global-v6 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6