Re: PI space under IPv6

Roger Jorgensen <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:19:50 +0100 (CET)

Newsgroups	gmane.org.apnic.global-v6
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Peter Sherbin wrote:
<snip>
> PI is just a requirement from users. The infrustructure to support it needs fixing,
> hence there is this discussion. Actually people asking for PI are more concerned
> with a pool of IDs to name/control/monitor their items/things and less so with
> routing. So split ID/locator. Give IDs to people. Build routing on locators. ISPs
> will follow the new architecture. Opposing ISPs will be naturally replaced by new
> willing ones.

At the point a user want PI without being able to justify getting 
their own address space based on the usage, they shouldn´t get it.

As said before, only organization big enough to justify their own netblock 
should get it. No PI or PA, just a netblock.



-- 

------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen              | - ROJO9-RIPE  - RJ85P-NORID
[email protected]           | - IPv6 is The Key!
-------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6