Re: PI space under IPv6

On Jan 19, 2007, at 4:19 AM, Roger Jorgensen wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Peter Sherbin wrote:
> <snip>
>> PI is just a requirement from users. The infrustructure to support  
>> it needs fixing,
>> hence there is this discussion. Actually people asking for PI are  
>> more concerned
>> with a pool of IDs to name/control/monitor their items/things and  
>> less so with
>> routing. So split ID/locator. Give IDs to people. Build routing on  
>> locators. ISPs
>> will follow the new architecture. Opposing ISPs will be naturally  
>> replaced by new
>> willing ones.
>
> At the point a user want PI without being able to justify getting  
> their own address space based on the usage, they shouldn´t get it.
>
> As said before, only organization big enough to justify their own  
> netblock should get it. No PI or PA, just a netblock.

Why should the size of an organization (as opposed to the networking  
needs of an organization) be
of relevance here ?

Regards
Marshall

>
>
> -- 
>
> ------------------------------
> Roger Jorgensen              | - ROJO9-RIPE  - RJ85P-NORID
> [email protected]           | - IPv6 is The Key!
> ------------------------------------------------------- 
> _______________________________________________
> global-v6 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6


_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6