Re: IPV4 to IPv6 migration

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:14:45PM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> In addition, in both IPv4 and IPv6, a renumbering event implies  
> disrupted communications (particularly since the actual IP addresses  
> are 'cached' in applications) and some folks care about that.

And this is actually where IPv6 could make renumbering a lot easier, as
IPv6 hosts are expected to cope with multiple addresses in parallel.

So it's not "renumber *now*", but "add new prefix, wait a few days,
deprecate old prefix, wait a few days, remove old prefix".  Which should
be far less disruptive.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  110584

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6