Re: IPV4 to IPv6 migration

 On 03 Jun, Jeroen Massar wrote:
 | David Conrad wrote:
 | [..]
 | >It's a bit sad that we didn't take the opportunity to define a new API  
 | >that would return 'network handles'
 | 
 | SCTP & HIP. Please look at these.

==> Without any intention to revive an old controversy, and without
calling it an "API" per se, RFC2874 (A6, made experimental by RFC
3363) attempted to address that issue, at least partially.

Still today, I don't think that the benefits of A6 outbalance its
costs.

Mohsen.
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6