Re: IPV4 to IPv6 migration
Tim Chown <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:05:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > > Just advertise a second prefix via RA from your v6 router, and watch your > machines happily auto-configure two global v6 addresses... > > Now, whether the combination of "multiple source addresses and multiple > destination addresses" usually leads to "the optimum pair being used for > a given connection" is a completely different question - and as far as > I understand, *that* part is really lacking. Yes, it does, or did when we tried it in 6NET. http://www.6net.org/publications/deliverables/D3.6.1.pdf http://www.6net.org/publications/deliverables/D3.6.2.pdf There are caveats of course, like existing long-running applications, but we renumbered a small enterprise at the network layer following the RFC4192 procedure. Also though it expired through lack of interest, the following text still makes (I think :) some good points on IPv6 renumbering: http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-chown-v6ops-renumber-thinkabout-05.txt It would be interesting to rerun the experiments we did in 6NET again now. But as Alain and others have noted, renumbering is not just about network renumbering; the devil lies in the details elsewhere. -- Tim _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6