Re: IPv6 Allocation Policy

Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.apnic.global-v6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On torsdag, maj 22, 2003, at 14:08 Europe/Stockholm, Gert Doering wrote:

>
> What *is* the current state of affairs concerning multihoming 
> solutions?


There are a number of types of solutions on the table. There are a 
number of more detailed proposals. There is no consensus on any of this 
(yet). The multi6 WG of IETF is having the first meeting in a long time 
at the Vienna IETF meeting. One of the goals of this meeting is to try 
and get consensus (if not before the meeting) on what solution 
class/space/type we are looking at. If nothing else, at least manage to 
trim the tracks down to fewer.

As for timeline. Hard to say. We could adopt a interim solution that 
would most likely stop work on a permanent one again until the pain 
level rise again. We could also simply work on a permanent solution. 
This will take at least a year. Then we need to get protocols 
done...and then we need to get it implemented and deployed. In best 
case. 4-5 years. Worst case 10?

- kurtis -

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.