Re: Fwd: Suggestion: charging for IPv4 space
Gert Doering <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:30:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:05:20PM -0700, Jeffrey A. Williams wrote:
> Your porbably right that it's too late to be dramatically effective.
> What this demonstrates to me as the lack of good IP address
> managment historically. Sorry to be so blunt.
It's very convenient to put up a big "blame them!" poster, no?
If you're a bit more realistic about it: there is no way to do "good
IPv4 address management" in a way that makes enough IPv4 addresses for
every person on earth. 4 billion vs. 6.7 billion as of june 2008.
Being more restrictive in the early days would probably make IPv4 last
5 or 10 years longer - and then there are *more* people affected by the
migration to "something large enough". So what had we gained?
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6