RE: IPv6 Allocation Policy
Anne Lord <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Izumi, >Here is how I distinguish the two: > > Policy Document > - Provides a set of ideas/criteria about IPv6 management > - Describes the basic concept of IPv6 address management, and > defines a criteria for allocations/assignments > > Guidelines > - Provides some tips for requestors in making IPv6 requests with > more specific details(like documented version of FAQs) > - It does not define any criteria itself. It merely complments the > idea behind the policy, possibly with some examples for specific cases > - Should be easily updated, reflecting the latest situation I'm obviously not your intended audience with these documents, but your suggestions make a lot of sense to me. Restricting the policy document to just that, with all other supporting information in a 'guidelines' document would I feel make the former easier to read and the latter would actually provide a useful and comprehensive 'support' document for those that need it. >We are currently working on the guideline within JPNIC and planning to >make a presentation in our coming Open Meeting in early July, held for >the Japanese community. This sounds great. >We are happy to share the outcome in the mailing list, and also >interested to hear the opinions of the others in the list. I think this would be very useful. Have you also considered making a presentation at the APNIC OPM in August? Regards, Anne -- _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6