RE: IPv6 Allocation Policy

Anne Lord <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.apnic.global-v6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Izumi,

>Here is how I distinguish the two:
>
>  Policy Document
>   - Provides a set of ideas/criteria about IPv6 management
>   - Describes the basic concept of IPv6 address management, and
>     defines a criteria for allocations/assignments
>
>  Guidelines
>   - Provides some tips for requestors in making IPv6 requests with
>     more specific details(like documented version of FAQs)
>   - It does not define any criteria itself. It merely complments the
>     idea behind the policy, possibly with some examples for specific cases
>   - Should be easily updated, reflecting the latest situation

I'm obviously not your intended audience with these documents, but your 
suggestions make a lot of sense to me.   Restricting the policy document to 
just that, with all other supporting information in a 'guidelines' document 
would I feel make the former easier to read and the latter would actually 
provide a useful and comprehensive 'support' document for those that need it.

>We are currently working on the guideline within JPNIC and planning to
>make a presentation in our coming Open Meeting in early July, held for
>the Japanese community.

This sounds great.

>We are happy to share the outcome in the mailing list, and also
>interested to hear the opinions of the others in the list.

I think this would be very useful.  Have you also considered making a 
presentation at the APNIC OPM in August?

Regards,

Anne
--

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.