Re: The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy
Geoff Huston <gih-pWIpc5MZKA/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5.1.0.14.2.20030905171109.00b83e40@localhost> |
I believe it _could_ be a registry issue, but along the lines you are describing Brian, rather than a "should be allowed" question. http://www.apnic.net/meetings/16/programme/sigs/docs/policy/addpol-pres-huston-unique-local-ipv6-unicast-add.pdf describes some thinking about the local use proposal that was aired at the recent APNIC meeting regards, Geoff At 04:26 PM 4/09/2003 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >3-3-1 Define if address for closed networks should be allowed in IPv6 > >I don't quite understand why this is a registry issue. It is in fact >the topic being vigorously debated in the IETF IPv6 WG at the moment >(under the general heading of local addresses). Once the IETF has >reached a technical conclusion, there may well be an IANA & RIR >issue, but not yet. > > Brian > >Izumi Okutani wrote: > > > > > I think there are a few more issues still (I don't think the list claims > > > to be all-inclusive of course :-), like: > > > > > > - experimental allocations?!? > > > - allocations to "critical infrastructures" (whatever those might be) > > > - allocations to IX fabrics for non-routable addresses > > Thanks for the note, Pekka. > > > > These policies are already implemented in the AP region, but I assume > > they are under discussions in other regions? In anycase, I am > > interested to hear comments about them too. > > > > Like this case, I am happy to add any other issues that happen to slip > > out of the list. > > > > > As a brief comment, the table may not really give enough context to know > > > which specific problem you're talking about in those cases (in many cases > > > it's more or less guessable, but not always) > > Yes, I see your point. I hope my presentation posted in APNIC meeting > > page gives you a better picture. > > > > "Summary of the current issues on IPv6 policy" (msword, mspowerpoint, pdf) > > http://www.apnic.net/meetings/16/programme/sigs/policy.html > > > > Izumi > > > > > HTH > > > > > > > From: Izumi Okutani <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: RE: [GLOBAL-V6]The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy > > > > Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 19:10:01 +0900 > > > > > > > > > Sure, Mat. > > > > > I'll put it up on the web shortly and notify the URL once it's fixed. > > > > > > > > > > Izumi > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: RE: [GLOBAL-V6]The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy > > > > > Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 10:06:43 +0100 > > > > > > > > > > > Izumi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Please make this list available on the web for those of us who > don't > > > > > > support your chosen filetype. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Mat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > Sent: 01 September 2003 07:32 > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > Subject: [GLOBAL-V6]The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attached is a summarised list of the current issues in IPv6 > > > > > > > policy, based on > > > > > > > discussions in this ML & feebacks from the Japanese community.The > > > > > > > second(Comments) sheet quotes the actual comments related to > > > > > > > the issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would love to hear your commnets on the issues listed, > > > > > > > especially those > > > > > > > categorised as priority "1". For example, one of the causes > of the > > > > > > > psychological barrier in initial allocations is > > > > > > > misunderstanding of the > > > > > > > intention of the criteria.APNIC regions will partly address > this by > > > > > > > developing a guidelines document, but perhaps, improving the > > > > > > > wordings in the > > > > > > > poicy is also worth considering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Izumi > > > > > > > JPNIC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > global-v6 mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the > > > Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." > > > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > global-v6 mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6 > >-- >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >Brian E Carpenter >Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM > >NEW ADDRESS <[email protected]> PLEASE UPDATE ADDRESS BOOK > >_______________________________________________ >global-v6 mailing list >[email protected] >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6 _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6