Re: IPv6 Allocation Policy
Pekka Savola <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 15 May 2003, Craig A. Huegen wrote: > On top of that, I do have one other concern... how does an end-user > network obtain address space that would be routable when divided into the > separate geographic regions? For example, if I want address space that I > can divide into chunks, each announced from a different Internet access > point, do I need to ask for a /32 for each of the routing points or should > the RIR's be advising ISP's that they should do filtering, if necessary, > at minimum_allocation + 4 bits, or something like that? I realize the > RIR's don't want to guarantee routability, but they really should take it > into consideration. Do I take it that you'd want to advertise more specifics based on some geography in some regions? This begs two questions (for which I have some answers of my own, but I'd like to hear yours): 1) why not advertise just the one /32 everywhere? 2) would those more specifics be scoped tightly to a routing point (that is, could one assume, that it might be possible to negotiate a special pass-through for the local affected ISP's for the more specific)? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6